Do You Have Good Suggestions about Saving Economy in FFXIV

Following the release of Patch 2.1 – A Realm Awoken, players encountered an unexpected economic downturn that contradicted their anticipation of acquiring Free Company housing. The implementation revealed prohibitively expensive property costs that placed homeownership beyond reach for most Free Companies. Members desperately attempt to generate additional ffxiv gil through donations, yet the economic environment continues deteriorating significantly worse than pre-2.1 conditions. Market Board transactions have nearly halted as the majority of available items lack practical utility in current gameplay systems. This unsustainable situation demands immediate intervention through community-driven economic revitalization strategies. We’ve identified two particularly insightful player proposals that address core economic issues.

The primary recommendation introduces an alternative acquisition method for housing through comprehensive quest chains rather than exclusive gil purchases. While implementation would require substantial development resources, this approach mirrors successful systems from Final Fantasy XI, particularly the Lu Shang fishing rod quest that demanded 10,000 carp for the game’s premier fishing equipment. This created both a profound achievement milestone and established sustainable markets for readily obtainable fish and associated bait materials. Applying similar mechanics to housing acquisition would enable universal participation regardless of financial resources, fostering collective accomplishment while stimulating economic activity.

Imagine Botanists clearing construction sites requiring 5,000 iron ingots for essential tools. Carpenters would process 10,000 oak lumber for structural framework, while Blacksmiths produce 5,000 steel sheets for plumbing systems and 5,000 rivets for support beams. Quality control might suddenly demand 5,000 high-quality lumber replacements, creating natural demand fluctuations.

This framework extends logically to incorporate diverse crafting disciplines. Weavers could manufacture insulation materials while Alchemists concoct specific quantities of fire and ice resistance potions for environmental protection. Blacksmiths might need to refine standard iron ore into specialized ‘housing-grade’ iron ore meeting construction standards.

Culinarians could participate through quests where the Immortal Flames faction requests meal provisions in exchange for architectural assistance like chimney construction. The fundamental principle ensures every player can contribute meaningfully—either through direct participation in quest chains or by supplying materials to the revitalized marketplace. Designing these quests with appropriate difficulty and duration creates worthwhile long-term objectives while justifying substantial financial investments. Crucially, the current system limits Free Company support to gil donations regardless of whether members possess single or multiple level 50 crafting specialties.

Another compelling suggestion advocates for deeper integration between crafting professions and dungeon-acquired equipment. Presently, crafting serves limited purpose since players obtain competent gear through tomestone exchanges or dungeon drops, systems that completely bypass crafters. Those who have invested time leveling crafting jobs find minimal practical application, while newcomers question the value proposition of undertaking these endeavors. A potential solution involves implementing materia enhancement systems allowing players to socket materia into dungeon gear, incrementally improving attributes through +1, +2, +3 enhancements with associated failure risks. This approach would dramatically stimulate the entire market economy as materials circulate and get consumed through purposeful crafting activities.

Successful implementation requires phased deployment beginning with single-craft integration before expanding to multi-disciplinary collaborations. Start with Botanist and Carpenter requirements for basic housing frameworks, then gradually incorporate Blacksmith, Weaver, Alchemist, and Culinarian components. This progressive approach allows market adjustments and prevents material shortages. Community organizers should establish resource tracking systems and coordinate member specialization to optimize collective progress.

Avoid common pitfalls like setting material requirements too high initially, which could discourage participation. Instead, implement tiered difficulty where initial housing quests require manageable quantities while later stages introduce more ambitious targets. This maintains engagement while building toward substantial accomplishments.

For crafting integration, begin with limited materia slots on entry-level dungeon gear before expanding to high-level equipment. This creates natural progression while allowing the market to adapt to new demand patterns. Advanced players can focus on optimizing material acquisition routes and establishing efficient production pipelines.

No reproduction without permission：GameCDjnh » Do You Have Good Suggestions about Saving Economy in FFXIV Revitalizing FFXIV's Economy: Practical Solutions for Housing and Crafting Integration